Difference between revisions of "KSL2003"
(→Legacy) |
(→Legacy) |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
== Legacy == | == Legacy == | ||
| − | Moving to the points system in 2003 was an interesting choice. KSL was new and so there was some experimentation going on. The move to the point system was an interesting one and it allowed for the stronger teams to continue strong throughout the year. The positive side to doing a point system is that a strong team wont get bounced in the playoffs. The downside is that once you are at the bottom of the league, you stay there. Aaron had scored the most points in week 16, 17 and would have had a chance to make a run in the playoffs. No one knows how things would have played out but it doesn't matter since Frail was able to dominate the whole year. | + | Moving to the points system in 2003 was an interesting choice. KSL was new and so there was some experimentation going on. The move to the point system was an interesting one and it allowed for the stronger teams to continue strong throughout the year. The positive side to doing a point system is that a strong team wont get bounced in the playoffs. The downside is that once you are at the bottom of the league, you stay there. [[Aaron]] had scored the most points in week 16, 17 and would have had a chance to make a run in the playoffs. No one knows how things would have played out but it doesn't matter since [[Frail]] was able to dominate the whole year. |
Revision as of 15:06, 13 June 2012
| Lance Frail | 5346.01 | |||
| Brian | 4992.13 | |||
| Kevin Smith | 4956.82 | |||
| Andy Hughes | 4895.24 | |||
| Mike Smith | 4594.44 | |||
| Aaron Hughes | 4373.26 | |||
| Previous | Current | Next | ||
In 2003 the commissioner decided to try the other play style for Fantasy Football. This style was known as the points system. As opposed to head-to-head matchups, you added up your points throughout the year and winner was the team with the most points. In addition to these changes, KSL lost Shawn Werderman but gained two new competitors in Aaron and Mike.
Contents
Week 1-5
During the first 5 weeks we saw Frail break out into an early lead. Many of the others were close to the middle but newcomer Aaron was 200 points behind the next lowest team. 200 points was almost a full game and so he would have some catching up to do.
Week 6-10
During this stretch of the season we saw the gaps get a little larger for the top teams and the bottom teams. Frail still had a 100 point lead over the next owner. Aaron had fallen 300 points behind the next team.
Week 11-17
Frail had not only pulled out ahead but he started to increase the gap against the other teams. Meanwhile, Brian, Kevin and Andrew were in a close race for the 2nd place spot. Mike, who was in that race, had a few bad weeks and so he dropped 200 points behind the next team. In last place, Aaron was about 400 points behind Mike.
Eventually, Frail was able to win by a commanding 350 points over his next rival. Brian was able to get a few points over Kevin and Andrew. Mike was in 5th place isolated by being 300 points under Andrew but 200 points over Aaron.
Legacy
Moving to the points system in 2003 was an interesting choice. KSL was new and so there was some experimentation going on. The move to the point system was an interesting one and it allowed for the stronger teams to continue strong throughout the year. The positive side to doing a point system is that a strong team wont get bounced in the playoffs. The downside is that once you are at the bottom of the league, you stay there. Aaron had scored the most points in week 16, 17 and would have had a chance to make a run in the playoffs. No one knows how things would have played out but it doesn't matter since Frail was able to dominate the whole year.
